For
too long, social scientists and their sociological theories have
offered us the idea that the individual is the source of his/her own
society; and hence, fractals though able to explain natural phenomena
may not be applicable to human research. Social phenomena may be so
complex that the sum of the parts are much more than the whole, that
human interactions and meanings are building blocks but also create
whole new structures that we call society. That is not true; there are
no ‘whole new structures.’
If
sociologists take an absolute position regarding society as an entity
over and above the individual then Fractal reality is what we
experience. Take for instance the fact that we cannot imagine anything
beyond what we already know. Aliens look like compositions of what we
already know, human constructs whether roads, buildings, computer
programs contain pattern, repeating pattern and those patterns are
socially constructed. One might say that math is at the helm of our
constructs or science better yet; but as far as the sociologist is
concerned or should be is that reality with its math and science is only
that which we agree upon, including what math is and science is. We can
even apply that to fractals, and of course we should because society
and social life is a fractal experience. Read Castoriadis or
Hofestadter.
No comments :
Post a Comment