Richard Dawkins, the noted and notorious atheist, in River Out of Eden, encourages us all to remember that DNA (and by that he means “people”) cares nothing about anything; DNA
simply is, according to him. So, he says, our reaction to the multitude
of troubles and events around us should be one of “pitiless
indifference.” The problem, however, is that no one is indifferent, not
even Dawkins.
Why tout such “indifference” when there seem to be no signs of it
anywhere? It might help if we sit back for a minute to try to get some
perspective. We need to see the big picture that secularism and atheism
want us all to hang on our walls and admire.
The first thing they want us to see in their picture is the sheer
purposeless and meaningless accident of our existence. The only reason
we happen to be here, they say, is because we happen to be here. There
is no purpose, no design, nothing meaningful about our presence in this
world. The natural world is all there is, and that world just happened
to bring you into existence. In their picture of reality, you are not
created; you evolved. And your evolution was nothing more than a random
collection of matter and chance circumstances.
Dawkins is anything but indifferent when it comes to this accident of
evolution. According to him, “It is absolutely safe to say that if you
meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is
ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I’d rather not consider
that).” Does this sound like a man who is indifferent to those who don’t
hold his views?
Let’s think of it this way: If you and I are, as Dawkins would have
us believe, a chance collection of random molecules, why would it matter
if we believed his view or not? Wouldn’t an affirmation of Dawkins’
view be as random and “accidental” as a denial of it? If my belief that
we were created by God is nothing more than a material function of my DNA, why does it matter? Specifically, why does it matter so much to Dawkins?
It is not too difficult to begin to see that secularism, with all of
its attendant irritants and irrationalities, is a house of cards. One
puff can raze it. Its own theories seep into its core like a
brain-eating virus and render it useless.
The reason the secular mindset cannot live with its own theory is
that if the theory is lived out, nothing is left. If Dawkins were taken
seriously, then a secularist who really lives like one would be so
committed to “pitiless indifference” that the only serious question
left, as Albert Camus pointed out decades ago, would be suicide. And
that, too, would be a choice of indifference.
*Source: https://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/secularism-and-our-christian-hope/
No comments :
Post a Comment